jesper wrote:Isn't that a perfectly valid way of argumenting?
Only if you actually mean it. It is not a perfectly argument when one doesn't give a shit about Camber and is only using him to avoid saying "I can't be arsed".
Isn't that the argument you used the other day while shooting down a valid question posed by Dagh?
Not really. The Icantbearsers say "Not using a feature Camber introduced is a sign of disrespect". I said "Not believing/trusting Camber is a sign of disrespect". There's a titanic difference. And it wasn't a valid question.
(what happend to the KO2CV 1.00 thread anyway
I deleted it.
why was all but 1 reply deleted and the thread locked??)
Because all but 1 reply was a fight full of insults.
Any other questions?